User:XXAprilCoookieXx

hello. i'm eluxet but call me luxe or eluxe.

i have a habit for writing very long paragraphs in my defense for some reason. here's one of them:

For a matter of fact, I actually do not understand your thought process. This is probably the most important message of this paragraph: '''EVERYBODY HAS THE RIGHT TO EXPRESS THEMSELVES BY TALKING. IT IS IN THE EQUALITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS ACT. A HUMAN "WRONG" DOES NOT EXIST. THEREFORE, ANY PERSON IN THE WORLD HAS THE RIGHT TO TALK WITHOUT CRITICISM FROM THE PUBLIC'''. I don't know if you can't tell the tone of voice through text, but I was joking and I was emphasizing people's different opinions, as each person has a choice that nobody knows for sure why they did it. Yes, I know, people know what percentage of votes are yes or no, but I want to point it out that most people's opinions are different from the 3 people who voted yes, which already indicates that most people are joking, as I don't think people said "No" seriously [obviously, there still might be some people who did it seriously, but no offense to those people] to make fun of you in any way, but in all seriousness, I was joking and I sincerely apologize that I didn't put /j [a tone indicator for text that assures people the person whom is speaking is JOKING AND IS NOT SERIOUS] at the end of my sentence to tell you that I was clearly joking and do not mean it in any way to harm you or hurt you. Oh also, I have done a bit of research on the Equality and Human Rights act, and it clearly says in Article 10 of the Human Rights act: Freedom of Expression, "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers..", which means, that every single person has the human right and freedom of expressing themselves [things like talking, crying, etc.] without receiving any type of criticism directed towards them. The public authority is not allowed to interfere with the person's freedom to hold ideas and opinions. In this case, frontiers [a line or border that separates a country or basically anything that separates two different people] do not matter. To get my point to you, there is even another article to show that the Equality and Human rights act is to be protected and applied without discrimination. So, you do not have the right to tell me that I am not allowed to express myself through talking, and you also do not have the right to tell me that because it is against the Equality and Human rights act, which clearly tells you about it in Article 14: Prohibition of Discrimination, "The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in the European Convention on Human Rights and the Human Rights Act shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status." In this case, you are not to discriminate my opinion just because the way that I am talking about it and emphasizing the fact is different from yours, which it is. Please do not criticize my statement, as once again, I am sorry I did not put an tone indicator at the end to tell you that I am joking. Another thing to clear up is that I was pointing it out and emphasizing it, not encouraging the opinions that were negative into saying you were not cool. Yes, nobody did ask, but, however, I do have the right to bring something up and put it to my attention. This is only my opinion, and you do not have to agree wit, but you have to accept the fact that it is there as you do not have the right to remove my opinion just because it is different.

GOD IM TIRED-